Best Practices
web-development
debugging
artificial intelligence
Productivity
It's 11:47 PM. Your code was working perfectly three hours ago. Now your contact form submits infinitely, dark mode flickers like an '80s disco, and your CSS seems to have developed a life of its own. Stack Overflow has 47 solutions that "worked for others," but none for your specific case. Sound familiar?
Until recently, this was the moment when some developers cried silently, others grabbed their tenth coffee, and the wisest simply went to bed. But in 2025, we have a tool that completely changes this scenario: collaborative debugging with artificial intelligence.
In the next few minutes, you'll learn a methodology that will turn those moments of frustration into opportunities for accelerated learning. Not only will you solve bugs faster, but you'll also understand why they happened and how to prevent them.
Let's consider a real scenario: you have a dark theme toggle that seems to work correctly, but doesn't persist after reloading the page.
1<button id="toggle-theme" onclick="toggleTheme()">🌙</button> 2<script> 3 function toggleTheme() { 4 document.body.classList.toggle('dark-theme'); 5 localStorage.setItem('theme', 'dark'); 6 } 7</script>
With the traditional method, your process would look like this:
This process, while educational, is slow and frustrating—especially when you have deadlines or just want to keep your development momentum.
With artificial intelligence, your conversation would look like this:
Your prompt:
1My dark theme toggle doesn't persist after reload. Here's my code: 2[full code]. The button works but after reloading it always goes back 3to light theme. What am I missing?
AI's response:
1The problem is that your code only saves the theme when the user clicks, 2but doesn't load the saved theme when the page initializes. You need to add 3a function that runs on load: 4 5function loadTheme() { 6 const savedTheme = localStorage.getItem('theme'); 7 if (savedTheme === 'dark') { 8 document.body.classList.add('dark-theme'); 9 } 10} 11 12// Run on page load 13document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', loadTheme); 14 15// Update toggleTheme to save the correct state 16function toggleTheme() { 17 document.body.classList.toggle('dark-theme'); 18 const isDark = document.body.classList.contains('dark-theme'); 19 localStorage.setItem('theme', isDark ? 'dark' : 'light'); 20}
Result: complete solution + pedagogical explanation in less than 2 minutes.
Debugging with AI usually works better because it gathers the full context and lets you analyze everything in one place; it proposes personalized solutions specific to your code; it includes explanations that help you understand the why as well as the how; and it offers real-time interaction for instant follow-up questions.
The difference between getting a useful answer and wasting time lies in how you describe the problem. Here are the five crucial elements:
Specific context tells the AI exactly which domain to focus its analysis on.
Don't describe the code, show it. But don't copy your whole project—just the relevant parts:
1<!-- Relevant HTML --> 2<button id="toggle-theme" onclick="toggleTheme()">Toggle</button> 3 4<!-- Relevant JavaScript --> 5<script> 6function toggleTheme() { 7 document.body.classList.toggle('dark-theme'); 8 localStorage.setItem('theme', 'dark'); 9} 10</script> 11 12<!-- Relevant CSS if applicable --> 13<style> 14.dark-theme { background: #333; color: white; } 15</style>
This clear comparison helps the AI pinpoint exactly where the disconnect is.
Include environment information:
This prevents the AI from suggesting things you've already ruled out.
Here's a format you can use for any problem:
1My [feature type] in [technology] has this problem: [specific description] 2 3RELEVANT CODE: 4[clean, formatted code] 5 6BEHAVIOR: 7- Expected: [clear description] 8- Actual: [what actually happens] 9- Context: [browser, device, specific conditions] 10 11ALREADY TRIED: 12- [action 1 that didn't work] 13- [action 2 that didn't work] 14 15What's the problem and how do I fix it?
1<button id="my-button">Click me</button> 2<script> 3document.getElementById('my-button').addEventListener('click', function() { 4 alert('Hello!'); 5}); 6</script>
Problem: The script runs before the DOM is ready.
Effective prompt:
1My button doesn't respond to clicks. Here's my code: [code]. 2The console shows no errors. Why doesn't the event listener work?
AI's solution:
1// The problem is timing. Wrap your code in DOMContentLoaded: 2document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { 3 document.getElementById('my-button').addEventListener('click', function() { 4 alert('Hello!'); 5 }); 6});
Key lesson: Always check JavaScript execution timing.
1.card { 2 transition: transform 0.3s ease; 3} 4.card:hover { 5 transform: scale(1.05) translateY(-10px); 6}
Problem: Multiple transforms competing with each other.
Effective prompt:
1My card has a hover animation that flickers instead of being smooth. 2The CSS is: [CSS code]. Why isn't the transition smooth?
AI's solution:
1/* The problem is you need to define the initial state */ 2.card { 3 transform: scale(1) translateY(0); /* Explicit base state */ 4 transition: transform 0.3s ease; 5} 6.card:hover { 7 transform: scale(1.05) translateY(-10px); 8}
Key lesson: Always define explicit initial and final states for complex transitions.
1window.addEventListener('scroll', function() { 2 const elements = document.querySelectorAll('.animate-on-scroll'); 3 elements.forEach(element => { 4 if (isInViewport(element)) { 5 element.classList.add('visible'); 6 } 7 }); 8});
Problem: Scroll event listener without throttling + multiple DOM queries.
Effective prompt:
1My app gets slow after scrolling. I have this code 2that animates elements when they enter the viewport: [code]. How can I 3optimize performance?
AI's solution:
1// Use Intersection Observer for better performance 2const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries) => { 3 entries.forEach(entry => { 4 if (entry.isIntersecting) { 5 entry.target.classList.add('visible'); 6 observer.unobserve(entry.target); // Stop observing once animated 7 } 8 }); 9}); 10 11// Observe elements only once 12document.querySelectorAll('.animate-on-scroll').forEach(el => { 13 observer.observe(el); 14});
Key lesson: For elements that only need to animate once, use Intersection Observer instead of scroll listeners.
1fetch('http://localhost:3001/api/contact', { 2 method: 'POST', 3 headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }, 4 body: JSON.stringify(formData) 5})
Problem: Hardcoded URL + possible CORS issues.
Effective prompt:
1My form works in development (localhost:3000) but fails in 2production (netlify). The code is: [code]. The console shows 3[specific error]. What's the difference between environments?
AI's solution:
1// Use relative URLs or environment variables 2const API_URL = process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production' 3 ? 'https://example.com/api/contact' 4 : 'http://localhost:3001/api/contact'; 5 6fetch(API_URL, { 7 method: 'POST', 8 headers: { 9 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 10 // Add CORS headers if needed 11 }, 12 body: JSON.stringify(formData) 13})
Key lesson: Always consider the differences between development and production environments.
Effective prompt:
1Users report that my [feature] sometimes works and sometimes doesn't. 2I can't consistently reproduce the error. My code is: [code]. 3What could cause inconsistent behavior?
Areas the AI typically investigates:
Key lesson: Inconsistent bugs usually involve timing, state, or environment differences.
Mistake:
1My code has an error, help me
Why it doesn't work: The AI doesn't have enough information to give a useful answer.
Consequence: You get generic answers that don't apply to your specific situation.
Mistake: Implementing the AI's solution without understanding what it does.
Typical scenario:
1// AI suggests this solution 2function debounce(func, wait) { 3 let timeout; 4 return function executedFunction(...args) { 5 const later = () => { 6 clearTimeout(timeout); 7 func(...args); 8 }; 9 clearTimeout(timeout); 10 timeout = setTimeout(later, wait); 11 }; 12} 13 14// You copy without understanding and use it incorrectly 15const myFunction = debounce(myOriginalFunction, 100);
Consequence: You create new bugs because you don't understand the parameters or usage context.
Solution: Always ask the AI to explain what the code does and why it's suggested.
Mistake: Switching conversations or tools without providing full context.
Typical scenario:
1Conversation 1: "How do I make a carousel?" 2[AI gives solution] 3Conversation 2: "My carousel doesn't work on mobile" 4[AI doesn't know which carousel you're talking about]
Consequence: The AI loses track and gives disconnected solutions.
Solution: Keep conversations coherent or always re-provide the full context.
Mistake: Only asking for the solution without the explanation.
1Prompt: "Give me the code to fix this: [problem]"
Consequence: You learn nothing, and are likely to make the same mistake again.
Better approach:
1Prompt: "What's the problem here and how do I fix it? Also explain 2why it happens so I can avoid it in the future: [code and context]"
Mistake: Pasting 200 lines of code without specific context.
Why it doesn't work: The AI gets confused trying to analyze too much irrelevant information.
Solution: Isolate the problem to the specific code parts you think are causing the issue.
To systematize the AI debugging process, the CLEAR methodology was developed:
C — Context. Start by giving the full framework: what kind of app you're building, with what technologies, and in what environment the problem occurs. A clear example: “I'm building a personal landing page with dark mode using HTML/CSS/vanilla JS. The problem occurs in Chrome desktop.”
L — Location. Indicate precisely where the error manifests: the file, the function, and if possible, the line. For example: “The problem is in my toggleTheme()
function in the index.html
file, specifically in theme persistence.”
E — Expected vs Reality. Describe the difference between what should happen and what actually happens, and attach screenshots or a short video if it helps. You could say: “Expected: on page reload, keep the theme the user chose. Reality: always goes back to light theme, even though localStorage
contains the correct value.”
R — Request. Finish by specifying exactly what you need: just the solution, solution with explanation, or alternative implementations. You can ask like this: “I need the solution and an explanation of why this happens, plus best practices to avoid it in future projects.”
1CONTEXT: I'm building a personal card with dark mode using 2HTML/CSS/vanilla JS, testing in Chrome desktop. 3 4LOCATION: The problem is in my toggleTheme() function in index.html, 5specifically in theme persistence after reload. 6 7EXPECTED vs REALITY: 8- Expected: On reload, keep the theme the user chose 9- Actual: Always goes back to light theme, even though localStorage has the correct value 10 11ATTEMPTS: 12- Verified that localStorage.setItem() works (value is saved correctly) 13- Tried with sessionStorage (same problem) 14- Checked the console (no JavaScript errors) 15 16REQUEST: I need the solution + explanation of why it happens, and best 17practices for persistent themes. 18 19[RELEVANT CODE HERE]
With this structure, the AI gets the same context you'd give a colleague: it understands the scenario, knows where to look, knows the gap between expected and actual, avoids repeating failed attempts, and responds with exactly the kind of help you need.
Debugging with AI isn't a one-off exchange, but an iterative conversation. Here's the ideal flow:
Your first message should include all the necessary CLEAR information so the AI fully understands your situation.
The AI might ask for more information:
The AI will provide specific code and explain why your original approach didn't work.
1"I implemented your solution and now it works perfectly. One follow-up question: 2does this approach also work with multiple themes (light, dark, auto)?"
If the first solution isn't perfect, the conversation continues until the desired result is achieved.
1"Could you explain why localStorage.getItem() needs to run in 2DOMContentLoaded? Are there other cases where this timing is critical?"
Your first prompt:
1My dark theme toggle doesn't persist after reload. Code: [include full code]. 2The toggle works but after refresh it goes back to light theme. I've already 3verified that localStorage saves the value. What's the problem?
AI responds:
1The problem is you save the theme when the user clicks, but don't 2load the saved theme on initialization. You need: 3 4[Provides complete solution] 5 6Does this implementation work for you?
Your validation:
1Perfect! It works exactly as expected. Follow-up question: 2how would I adapt this to have three options: light, dark, and auto 3(based on system preference)?
AI extends the solution:
1For three options, modify the approach like this: 2 3[Provides extended solution] 4 5This respects the system preference when set to "auto" and allows manual overrides.
This iterative conversation is much richer than just searching for an answer on Stack Overflow.
As you use this methodology, you'll accumulate prompts that consistently give you good answers:
For JavaScript errors:
1My function [name] doesn't [expected behavior]. Code: [code]. 2Console shows: [exact error]. What's the problem and how 3do I fix it without changing the general logic?
For CSS problems:
1My [element] looks [problem] in [context]. Relevant CSS: [code]. 2It should look [description]. Which property is causing the conflict 3and what's the cleanest solution?
For performance issues:
1My [app/function] becomes [symptom] when [condition]. 2Suspect code: [code]. What's the bottleneck and what's the 3most effective optimization?
Over time, you'll notice patterns specific to the technologies you use most:
If you mainly work with vanilla JavaScript:
If you work with frameworks like React:
Keep notes on these patterns for future reference. This personal documentation becomes an invaluable resource for future problems.
Level 1 - Reactive: You only fix what's broken when it breaks.
Level 2 - Proactive: You anticipate common problems and prevent them.
Level 3 - Strategic: You design your code so it's easy to debug from the start.
Level 4 - Mastery: You teach your methodology to others and contribute to collective knowledge.
When you reach Level 3, your code will naturally include:
1// Strategic logging 2function toggleTheme() { 3 console.log('toggleTheme called, current theme:', getCurrentTheme()); 4 5 const newTheme = document.body.classList.contains('dark-theme') ? 'light' : 'dark'; 6 7 try { 8 document.body.classList.toggle('dark-theme'); 9 localStorage.setItem('theme', newTheme); 10 console.log('Theme switched to:', newTheme); 11 } catch (error) { 12 console.error('Failed to save theme preference:', error); 13 // Fallback behavior 14 } 15} 16 17// Helper function for debugging 18function getCurrentTheme() { 19 return document.body.classList.contains('dark-theme') ? 'dark' : 'light'; 20}
Every bug you solve with AI isn't just a problem fixed—it's a personalized masterclass in web development. The AI doesn't just fix your code; it explains concepts, suggests best practices, and prepares you to avoid similar problems.
This is the fundamental difference between traditional debugging and debugging with AI: instead of just finding the solution, you get contextual education that accelerates your growth as a developer.
Alright, now that you know how to ask AI properly, iterate step by step, and review with clear criteria, let's see how your relationship with bugs changes. What used to be firefighting and guessing now becomes a guided conversation: you explain the context, point out where it hurts, contrast expected with actual, and ask for exactly the kind of help you need. The result is a calmer, more measurable, and predictable process. Here's the before and after:
Aspect | Before applying this methodology | After mastering debugging with AI |
---|---|---|
Bugs | Frustration and wasted time | Opportunities for targeted learning |
Debugging | Solitary and stressful process | Intelligent and educational collaboration |
Errors | Enemies of your productivity | Personalized teachers available 24/7 |
Solutions | Hours of research with uncertain results | Structured conversations with predictable outcomes |
When your code doesn't work, breathe and smile. With a clear request, short iterations, and review criteria, AI acts as a personal tutor who teaches you exactly what you need, right when you need it, with patience and crystal-clear explanations. And it's not just a feeling; those who adopt this way of working report tangible improvements: debugging time drops from ~45 min to ~5, problem understanding rises from ~30% to ~90%, repeat bug prevention goes from 0% to ~70%, stress drops noticeably, and learning speed multiplies 3–5×. Next time something breaks, remember the process and return to the cycle: define well, test, review, adjust, and repeat.