Self-paced

Explore our extensive collection of courses designed to help you master various subjects and skills. Whether you're a beginner or an advanced learner, there's something here for everyone.

Bootcamp

Learn live

Join us for our free workshops, webinars, and other events to learn more about our programs and get started on your journey to becoming a developer.

Upcoming live events

Learning library

For all the self-taught geeks out there, here is our content library with most of the learning materials we have produced throughout the years.

It makes sense to start learning by reading and watching videos about fundamentals and how things work.

Search from all Lessons


LoginGet Started
← Back to Lessons
Edit on Github

Understanding and Mitigating The Server Side Request Forgery Vulnerability

A Specific Technical Example of SSRF

In 2019, Capital One suffered a massive data breach that exposed the personal information of over 100 million customers. The attack, which resulted in the theft of credit card applications, Social Security numbers, and bank account information, was made possible through a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. This incident highlights the severe consequences of SSRF and underscores the importance of understanding and mitigating this critical web security flaw.

Server-Side Request Forgery is a web security vulnerability that allows an attacker to induce the server-side application to make HTTP requests to an arbitrary domain of the attacker's choosing. In this lesson, we'll explore the concept of SSRF, its impact, and how to prevent such devastating security breaches.

A Specific Technical Example of SSRF

Let's examine a concrete example of an SSRF vulnerability in a web application. Consider the following scenario involving a flawed image processing functionality:

Imagine a web application that allows users to submit a URL of an image, which the server then fetches, processes, and displays back to the user. The process works as follows:

  1. User submits a URL through a form on the website.
  2. The server receives the URL and makes a request to fetch the image.
  3. The server processes the image (e.g., resizes or applies filters).
  4. The processed image is displayed back to the user.
1from flask import Flask, request, Response 2import requests 3 4app = Flask(__name__) 5 6@app.route('/fetch_image', methods=['POST']) 7def fetch_image(): 8 image_url = request.form.get('image_url') 9 if image_url: 10 # Fetch the image from the URL provided by the user 11 response = requests.get(image_url) 12 image = response.content 13 14 # Process the image (e.g., resize or apply filters) 15 # For simplicity, we'll just display the image without any processing 16 return Response(image, content_type='image/jpeg') 17 18if __name__ == '__main__': 19 app.run()
1const express = require('express'); 2const axios = require('axios'); 3const app = express(); 4 5app.use(express.urlencoded({ extended: true })); 6 7app.post('/fetch_image', async (req, res) => { 8 const imageUrl = req.body.image_url; 9 if (imageUrl) { 10 try { 11 // Fetch the image from the URL provided by the user 12 const response = await axios.get(imageUrl, { responseType: 'arraybuffer' }); 13 const image = response.data; 14 15 // Process the image (e.g., resize or apply filters) 16 // For simplicity, we'll just display the image without any processing 17 res.contentType('image/jpeg'); 18 res.send(image); 19 } catch (error) { 20 res.status(500).send('Error fetching image'); 21 } 22 } else { 23 res.status(400).send('No image URL provided'); 24 } 25}); 26 27const PORT = 3000; 28app.listen(PORT, () => { 29 console.log(`Server running on port ${PORT}`); 30});

As you can see the image_url is received and used to fetch an alledged image from the internet. The problem here is that we are trusting that this image_url is a valid image and not some internal endpoint. Our server is making a request to this image_url and returning the response. We are giving hackers to provide a URL and we are fetching it. 🫣 What if they provide a URL to our intranet?

While this code appears straightforward, it is vulnerable to SSRF. An attacker could exploit this functionality by submitting a malicious URL that points to internal services or endpoints, potentially gaining unauthorized access to sensitive data or performing actions that the server is allowed to do on its network.

For instance, the attacker could submit the following URL:

1http://localhost/admin/internal/secret

If the server running this code has access to the internal localhost interface, it will attempt to fetch the resource, possibly leaking sensitive internal information.

Impact of SSRF

The potential damage caused by an SSRF attack depends on the permissions and network access of the vulnerable server. Here are some of the risks:

  • Access to internal services: SSRF can allow attackers to access services that are otherwise unreachable from the internet, such as internal databases, cloud metadata endpoints, or management interfaces.
  • Data exfiltration: Sensitive data stored on internal servers may be leaked to the attacker.
  • Remote code execution: In some cases, SSRF can lead to further attacks such as remote code execution (RCE) if the attacker can exploit additional vulnerabilities on the internal network.

The Capital One breach is a perfect example of how an SSRF vulnerability can be leveraged to access internal AWS metadata, leading to the theft of sensitive customer data.

Preventing SSRF Attacks

To mitigate the risk of SSRF vulnerabilities, consider the following best practices:

  1. Input validation and whitelisting: Only allow requests to trusted domains by implementing strict whitelists. Avoid letting users submit arbitrary URLs.
  2. Network segmentation: Ensure that internal services are not directly accessible by the web application. Limit the server’s ability to make outbound requests to internal networks.
  3. Disable unnecessary protocols: Prevent the use of protocols like file://, gopher://, or others that may introduce additional risks.
  4. Use a firewall or proxy: Route outgoing requests through a firewall or proxy to block attempts to access internal resources.
  5. Cloud metadata protection: If you're using cloud services like AWS, ensure that metadata endpoints are properly restricted to prevent unauthorized access.

By adopting these measures, organizations can significantly reduce the risk of SSRF attacks and protect sensitive data from malicious actors.

Tools to Detect SSRF

Detecting SSRF vulnerabilities can be challenging, but there are several tools and techniques that can help identify and mitigate these risks:

    • Set up Burp Suite as a proxy and configure your browser to use it.
    • Intercept and analyze HTTP requests made by the application.
    • Look for requests that include user-supplied URLs or parameters that could be manipulated.
    • Use Burp Suite's Intruder tool to test various payloads and observe the server's response.
  1. OWASP ZAP: The OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is an open-source web application security scanner. To use OWASP ZAP for detecting SSRF:

    • Set up ZAP as a proxy and configure your browser to use it.
    • Spider the application to discover all endpoints.
    • Use the Active Scan feature to test for SSRF vulnerabilities by injecting payloads into URL parameters.
    • Review the scan results for any indications of SSRF vulnerabilities.
  2. Nmap: Nmap is a network scanning tool that can be used to discover open ports and services on a network. To use Nmap for detecting SSRF:

    • Run Nmap to scan the internal network and identify open ports and services.
    • Use the information gathered to identify potential internal services that could be targeted by SSRF attacks.
    • Test the application by attempting to access these internal services through user-supplied URLs.
  3. SSRFmap: SSRFmap is a specialized tool designed to automate the detection and exploitation of SSRF vulnerabilities. To use SSRFmap:

    • Install SSRFmap and configure it with the target URL and parameters.
    • Run SSRFmap to scan for SSRF vulnerabilities and test various payloads.
    • Review the results to identify any successful SSRF exploits.
  4. Amass: Amass is a tool for network mapping and attack surface discovery. To use Amass for detecting SSRF:

    • Run Amass to map the network and discover internal services and endpoints.
    • Use the information gathered to identify potential targets for SSRF attacks.
    • Test the application by attempting to access these internal services through user-supplied URLs.
  5. Custom Scripts: Security professionals can also write custom scripts to test for SSRF vulnerabilities. To use custom scripts:

    • Identify user-supplied URL parameters in the application.
    • Write scripts to inject various payloads into these parameters and observe the server's response.
    • Analyze the responses to determine if the application is vulnerable to SSRF.

By using these tools and techniques, organizations can proactively identify and address SSRF vulnerabilities, reducing the risk of exploitation by malicious actors.